Sunday, September 14, 2008

Double Triplane - Eduard's Fokker Dr. I Dual Combo




"Mama got two for the price of one and so can you ..." was the tag-line of a fast-talking used car lot commercial, owned by identical twins, that I grew up with -and decades later, Eduard has finally given us a "two for the price of one" that we can enjoy. Eduard has taken their excellent Dr.I and packaged two identical kits - with decals for six different colorful versions, none of them with the German's trademarked Lozenge camouflage, which means that they can be produced without painting or decaling nightmares.

Like the Fokker D.VII, the Fokker Dr.I has few flying wires - it is clean, uncluttered and, for a biplane, remarkably easy to build. There are many good ways of rigging a model biplane (or triplane) but none of them are very easy. Which is one more reason why so many modelers like building Fokker Dr.I. It is historically-significant as the favored mount of the mythic Red Baron, it is visually appealing and distinctive, it is usually colorful and it is far less complex than - for instance, the Bristol Fighter, with it's spider-web of rigging and struts.



The Fokker Dr.I was the ultimate triumph of maneuverability over speed - with an underpowered rotary engine and the extra weight and drag of the third wing, the Dr.I was never going to set any speed records. But that extra wing - along with the sesquiplane strut between the two wheels - gave the aircraft incredible lift and maneuverability - it could turn on a dime and give you seven cents change.

However, by late in the war, the Fokker Dr.I had "an issue" that was to come back years later - in late '44 and early '45, with the Heinkel He-162 - when glue-manufacturing production standards fell off and wooden wings started to come apart in the air. After a few fatal accidents, German pilots were - for the most part - eager to move up to another type of aircraft - a late-model Albatros or the world-beating Fokker D.VII - but Richthofen stayed with the triplane right up until he met his end at the hand of either an Australian fighter pilot or an unknown Tommy.

Eduard has done their typical exceptional best in crafting this model - and the Dual Combo package gives you two for the price of one. If you want to add a colorful World War I fighter aircraft without having to deal with a lot of rigging, this is the plane, and the model, for you.

Weekend Fokker




For those who want to build World War I aircraft, but don't want to be overwhelmed with rigging wires and such, the Fokker D.VII is an ideal kit - clean, powerful and almost bereft of flying wires. Which is why I like the Fokker D.VII Weekend Edition - it takes a relatively simple biplane and makes it even simpler.

As with other Eduard Weekend Editions, the markings are for a single aircraft - in this case, the D.VII flown by Oblt. Herman Goering. Overall white, it isn't the most colorful D.VII, but it is distinctive and - because of Goering's later career - historical. The aircraft kit itself is up to Eduard's usual standards (which - especially for a limited run kit - is remarkably high).

There's not a lot to say that hasn't been said about the actual aircraft - the Fokker D.VII was perhaps the best single-seat fighter that saw service in World War I - it was the only German/Central Powers aircraft specifically mentioned in the Versailles Treaty which formally ended the war. Copies were taken back to the US and were used operationally by the nascent US Army air service for four or five years after the end of the war. At the very end of the war, Dutchman Tony Fokker slipped the parts to manufacture 50 or more Fokker D.VIIs across the border into neutral Holland, and used those to get his company restarted in Holland.

The Eduard kit captures the rugged elegance and efficient lethality of the Fokker D.VII - it makes up into a remarkable kit, and the Weekend Edition does it with ease and simplicity. If you want to add a Fokker D.VII to your collection, this is a great kit.

Wulf in Eagle's Clothing - Eduard Takes The Next Step in Fw 190 Modeling





Take a plane that "seems" to have been designed based on Howard Hughes' high-speed racer - the smallest, sleekest aircraft built around a powerful air-cooled radial engine - and offer it to a leadership that wasn't interested in it. That was the Focke Wulf 190. Succinctly, it was a plane that the powers-that-be in Berlin had little interest in. The war would be won, they believed, with the planes already in hand - in other words, the Bf 109 and Bf 110. Why waste time, money and production resources on a new plane, they wondered, when the war was all but won.

Focke Wulf was pushing the Fw 190 - Kurt Tank's remarkably powerful fighter - in part because they had nothing much to build for the Luftwaffe beside the long-range patrol bomber, the Fw 200 Kondor, a converted airliner which served an important, but limited role in the war. They'd rather build their own designs than subcontract Messerschmitt fighters, so they had to come up with a fighter that was better than the Bf 109, without competing for strategic resources such as the Daimler-Benz aircraft engines. Which is at least one reason why Tank selected a tightly-cowled radial - with a cooling fan between the propeller and the engine - it was used for second-line aircraft, but not for high-priority strategic aircraft.

Initially, the Fw 190 was designed to be a point-defense interceptor fighter, which meant that it could climb quickly, carry a heavy machine-gun-and-cannon armament, and had excellent all-round visibility - just what was needed for intercepting enemy bombers flying over Festung Europa. The Fw 190's first assignment was on the French coast, defending the Reich from daylight raids by British fast bombers and fighter sweeps. However, it wasn't long before Operation Barbarossa - the invasion of the Soviet Union - stalled; instead of a lightning assault, it became a grinding ground war. Stukas were once again in fashion - they could serve as flying artillery and destroy anything on the ground. However, they couldn't defend themselves, and there weren't enough Bf 109s in the theater to both hold aerial superiority and fly escort for the increasingly-vulnerable Stukas.

What the Germans needed was a plane which could carry a meaningful ground-attack bomb load, deliver its attack, then fight its way out of trouble. And that, it appeared, was the Fw 190. At first, A-model Focke Wulfs were used in that dual-mission Jabo role, but it was quickly seen that for survival on the Eastern Front, ground attack Fw's needed extra armor protection - Soviet ground fire was deadly and increasingly heavy, and with aircrew attrition reducing pilots' average skill level, every bit of extra protection was needed.

Oddly, some of the armor developed for Eastern Front ground-attack versions later appeared in up-armored bomber-attack versions designed to survive the massed .50 caliber machine-gun fire from hoards of B-17s in tight formation.

Eduard has been creating a number of truly exceptional radial-engined Fw 190s - A-5, A-8 and other variants - and it isn't surprising that they adapted those molds to create the F-8, essentially the ultimate ground-attack Focke Wulf. It took seven light-olive-colored sprues, along with clear parts, photo-etched parts and masks to cover all the options of this remarkably engineered kit. The engine alone has something like 17 million parts, and the cockpit another 147,000 parts. I've read some reports that the Eduard Focke Wulf kits were "over-engineered" - but that is a judgment call, and a call I don't share. This kit is overwhelmingly remarkable - and to some, just plain overwhelming - but I have never seen such an exquisitely designed and engineered kit. Not for the faint of heart, for sure - for those modelers (and that includes me, every time I want to relax) who ARE faint-of-heart, Eduard has their Focke Wulf Fw 190 Weekend Edition (which is a hell of a kit in its own right).



What Wikipedia Says about the F-model Focke Wulf:

Attack versions

While nearly all variants of the Fw 190 could carry bombs and other air-to-ground ordnance, there were two dedicated attack versions of the Fw 190. The Luftwaffe was looking for aircraft to replace the Henschel Hs 123 biplane, which were seriously outmatched in 1942, as well as the slow and heavy Junkers Ju 87. The excellent low-level performance and reasonably high power of the Fw 190 suggested it would be a "natural" in this role. Two versions of the Fw 190 were eventually built, customized for this mission.

Fw 190 F

Restored Fw 190 F-8 in late war markings.
Restored Fw 190 F-8 in late war markings.

The Fw 190 F was started as a Fw 190 A-0/U4. Early testing started in May 1942. This A-0 was outfitted with centre-line and wing mounted ETC 50 bomb racks. The early testing was quite good, and Focke-Wulf began engineering the attack version of the Fw 190. New armor was added to the bottom of the fuselage protecting the fuel tanks and pilot, the engine cowling, and the landing gear mechanisms and outer wing mounted armament. Finally the Umrüst-Bausätze kit 3 was fitted to the aircraft by means of a ETC 501 or ER4 centre-line mounted bomb rack and up to a SC250 bomb under each wing. This aircraft was designated the Fw 190 F-1. The first 30 Fw 190 F-1s were renamed Fw 190 A-4/U3s; however, Focke-Wulf quickly began assembling the aircraft on the line as Fw 190 F-1s as their own model with 18 more F-1s built before switching to the F-2. The Fw 190 F-2s were renamed Fw 190 A-5/U3s, which again were soon assembled as Fw 190 F-2s on the production line. There were 270 Fw 190 F-2s built according to Focke-Wulf production logs and RLM acceptance reports.

The Fw 190 F-3 was based on the Fw 190 A-5/U17, which was outfitted with a centre-line mounted ETC 501 bomb rack, and two double ETC 50 bomb racks under each wing. 432 Fw 190 F-3s were built.

Due to difficulties creating an effective strafing Fw 190 F able to take out the Russian T-34 tank, the F-4 through F-7 models were abandoned, and all attempts focused on conversion of the Fw 190 A-8.

The Fw 190 F-8 differed from the A-8 model with a slightly modified injector on the compressor which allowed for increased performance at lower altitudes for several minutes. The F-8 was also outfitted with the improved FuG 16 ZS radio unit which provided much better communication with ground combat units. Armament on the Fw 190 F-8 was two MG 151/20 20 mm cannon in the wing roots and two MG 131 machine guns above the engine. According to RLM acceptance reports at least 3,400 F-8s were built, probably several hundreds more in December 1944 and from February to May 1945 (data for these months is missing and probably lost).

Dozens of F-8s served as various testbeds for anti-tank armament, including the WGr.28 280 mm ground-to-ground missile, 88 mm Panzerschreck 2 rockets, Panzerblitz 1 and R4M rockets.

There were also several Umrüst-Bausätze kits developed for the F-8, which included: The Fw 190 F-8/U1 long range JaBo, outfitted with underwing V.Mtt-Schloß shackles to hold two 300-liter fuel tanks. ETC 503 bomb racks were also fitted, allowing the Fw 190 F-8/U1 to carry one SC 250 bomb under each wing and one SC 250 bomb on the centre-line.

The Fw 190 F-8/U2 torpedo bomber, outfitted with an ETC 503 bomb rack under each wing and a centre-line mounted ETC 504. The U2 was also equipped with the TSA 2 A weapons sighting system that improved the U2's ability to attack seaborne targets.

The Fw 190 F-8/U3 heavy torpedo bomber was outfitted with an ETC 502, which allowed it to carry one BT-1400 heavy torpedo. Due to the size of the torpedo, the U3's tail gear needed to be lengthened. The U3 also was fitted with the 2,000 PS BMW 801S engine, and the tail from the Ta 152.

The Fw 190 F-8/U4 created as a night fighter, was equipped with flame dampers on the exhaust and various electrical systems such as the FuG 101 radio altimeter, the PKS 12 automatic pilot, and the TSA 2 A sighting system. Weapons fitted ranged from torpedoes to bombs; however, the U4 was outfitted only with two MG 151/20 cannon as fixed armament.

The Fw 190 F-9 was based on the Fw 190 A-9 but with the new Ta 152 tail unit, a new bulged canopy as fitted to late-build A-9s, and four ETC 50 or ETC 70 bomb racks under the wings. According to RLM acceptance reports 147 F-9 were built in January 1945, probably several hundreds more from February to May 1945 (data for these months is missing and probably lost).


Yakkity Yak - Don't Shoot Back ... Soviet Yaks by Eduard




Take a weekend, build a Yak 3 - what could be easier? Eduard thinks that nothing should be easier, and they know what they're doing.

The Yak 3 was one of a series of four high-performance Yak fighters produced in World War II, designed by the team lead by Alexander Sergeivich Yakolev. Powered by a Klimov M-105P liquid-cooled engine that was the rough equivalent of the Daimler Benz DB 600-series, the Merlin and the Allison liquid-cooled fighter engines, the plane was crude by western standards, and relatively lightly armed. However, the combination of a hard-hitting 20mm cannon and one or two rapid-fire .50 caliber machine guns firing through the nose, making it easier to hit what the pilot was aiming at.

In the right hands, the lightweight Yaks were far more maneuverable than either the Bf 109 or the Fw 190, themselves no slouches when it came to low-level maneuverability.

The Yak series of fighters was the next generation beyond the Polikarpov I-16 that, in its day, was a world-beater - the first retractable gear cantilever monoplane fighter with a 1,000 horsepower engine and more than two puny rifle-caliber machine guns - the plane set the pattern for all the single-seat, single-engined fighters that served in World War II.

However, the I-16 was not only Polikarpov's stellar achievement, it was his swan-song. Nothing he designed afterwards was successful, and failure was not something that endeared even a successful designer to Stalin. However, Yakolev was just beginning to come into his own, and the Yak 1 (followed by the Yak 7, Yak 9 and Yak 3 - not necessarily in numerical order) began a successful series of aircraft that endured throughout the Cold War.

The Yak 3 is clean and uncomplicated, especially by western standards. Sleek, swift, maneuverable and attractive - Eduard has captured the look and the power, and done so in a Weekend Kit that has relatively few parts, and decals for but a single aircraft - but it is a particularly colorful aircraft, which makes up into a remarkable model. Incredibly, a well-built Weekend kit looks nearly as good as a 500-part mega-masterpiece - yet it literally can be built in a weekend, especially if you've got a long weekend.

For those who want more information, here's some of what Wikipedia has to say about the Soviet's Yak 3:

Armament

The first 197 Yak-3 were armed with a single 20 mm ShVAK cannon and one 12.7 mm UBS machine gun, with subsequent aircraft receiving a second UBS for a weight of fire of 2.72 kg (6.0 lb) per second using high-explosive ammunition.

Variants

Yakovlev Yak-3 (replica)
Yakovlev Yak-3 (replica)
Yak-3
main production version
Yak-3 (VK-107A)
Klimov VK-107A engine with 1,230 kW (1,650 hp) and 2x 20 mm Berezin B-20 cannons with 120 rounds of ammunition each. After several mixed-construction prototypes, 48 all-metal production aircraft were built in 1945-1946. In spite of excellent performance (720 km/h (447 mph) at 5,750 m (18,860 ft)), VK-107 was prone to overheating and it was decided to leave the engine for the better-suited Yak-9.
Yak-3 (VK-108)
Yak-3 (VK-107A) modified with VK-108 engine with 1,380 kW (1,850 hp), and armed a single 23 mm Nudelman-Suranov NS-23 cannon with 60 rounds of ammunition. The aircraft reached 745 km/h (463 mph) at 6,290 m (20,630 ft) in testing but suffered from significant engine overheating. Another Yak-3 with 2x 20 mm Berezin B-20 cannons was also fitted with the engine with similar results.
Yak-3K
tank destroyer with a 45 mm Nudelman-Suranov NS-45 cannon, only a few built because Yak-9K was a better match for the weapon
Yak-3P
produced from April 1945 until mid-1946, armed with 3x 20 mm Berezin B-20 cannons with 120 rounds for the middle cannon and 130 rounds for each of the side weapons. The three-cannon armament with full ammunition load was actually 11 kg (24 lb) lighter than that of a standard Yak-3, and the one-second burst mass of 3.52 kg (7.74 lb) was greater than that of most contemporary fighters. Starting in August 1945, all Yak-3 were produced in the Yak-3P configuration with a total of 596 built.
Yak-3PD
high-altitude interceptor with Klimov VK-105PD engine and a single 23 mm Nudelman-Suranov NS-23 cannon with 60 rounds of ammunition, reached 13,300 m (43,625 ft) in testing but did not enter production due to unreliability of the engine.
Yak-3RD (Yak-3D)
experimental aircraft with an auxiliary Glushko RD-1 liquid-fuel rocket engine with 2,9 kN (650 lbf) of thrust in the modified tail, armed with a single 23 mm Nudelman-Suranov NS-23 cannon with 60 rounds of ammunition. On May 11, 1945, the aircraft reached 782 km/h (485 mph) at 7,800 m (25,585 ft). During the August 16 test flight, the aircraft crashed for unknown reasons, killing the test pilot V.L. Rastorguev. Like all mixed powerplant aircraft of the time, the project was abandoned in favor of turbojet engines.
Yak-3T
tank destroyer version armed with 1x 37 mm Nudelman N-37 cannon with 25 rounds and 2x 20 mm Berezin B-20S cannons with 100 rounds each. Cockpit was moved 0.4 m (1 ft 4 in) back to compensate for the heavier nose. Engine modifications required to accept the weapons resulted in serious overheating problems which were never fixed and the aircraft did not advance beyond the prototype stage.
Yak-3T-57
single Yak-3T with a 57 mm OKB-16-57 cannon
Yak-3TK
powered by a VK-107A engine, and fitted with an exhaust turbocharger.
Yak-3U
Yak-3 fitted with Shvetsov ASh-82FN radial engine with 1,380 kW (1,850 hp) in an attempt to increase performance while avoiding the overheating problems of VK-107 and VK-108. Wingspan increased by 20 cm (8 in), wings moved 22 cm (9 in) forward, cockpit raised by 8 cm (3 in). Armament of 2x 20 mm Berezin B-20 cannons with 120 rounds per gun. The prototype reached 682 km/h (424 mph) at 6,000 m (19,680 ft) and while successful did not enter production because it was completed after the war.
Yak-3UTI
two-seat conversion trainer based on Yak-3U powered by Shvetsov ASh-21 radial piston engine. The aircraft became the prototype for the Yak-11.

Operators

Flag of France France
(Normandie-Niemen squadron)
Flag of Poland Poland
Air Force of the Polish Army
Flag of the Soviet Union Soviet Union
Soviet Air Force
Flag of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslavia
SFR Yugoslav Air Force
  • 39th Fighter Aviation Division
    • 111th Fighter Aviation Regt - Skoplje
    • 113th Fighter Aviation Regt - Zagreb-Pleso
  • 44th Fighter Aviation Division
    • 112nd Fighter Aviation Regt - Mostar
    • 254th Fighter Aviation Regt - Mostar
  • 21st Mixed Aviation Division
    • 204th Fighter Aviation Regt - Zadar

Specifications (Yak-3)

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 8.5 m (27 ft 10 in)
  • Wingspan: 9.2 m (30 ft 2 in)
  • Height: 2.39 m (7 ft 11 in)
  • Wing area: 14.85 m² (159.8 ft²)
  • Empty weight: 2,105 kg (4,640 lb)
  • Loaded weight: 2,692 kg (5,864 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: kg (lb)
  • Powerplant:Klimov VK-105PF-2 V-12 liquid-cooled piston engine, 962 kW (1,290 hp)

Performance

Armament




Saturday, September 13, 2008

What The Hell ... Cat! - The 1/48 Eduard Hellcats


Holy Hellcat, Batman!

Twenty to one? That's a pretty good won-loss ratio in anybody's league. But when it comes to life-and-death combat, that kill ratio is about as good as it gets. Few planes have done so well - not even the Zero at the very start of World War II, when that incredible fighter destroyed every plane crazy enough to challenge it for aerial supremacy - but even the Zero's unflagging supremacy in 1941 couldn't challenge the almost unbelievable win-loss record of the Hellcat.

In the 1930s, the US Navy had a strong and effective pattern - as soon as a new fighter was in production, they called for the next generation design. As a result, no sooner had the Wildcat gone into production when the Navy asked Grumman and a few other manufacturers to come up next-generation designs. Grumman had an excellent track record, going back a decade to the FF-1 and SF-1 two-seat fighters, the F2F and F3F hotrod fighters - and after a blip with the original XF4F biplane was a non-starter, Grumman was back as the Navy's pre-eminent fighter manufacturer with the F4F-3/4 Wildcat (and it's General Motors follow-up, the FM-1 and the FM2 "Wilder" Wildcat. But when the original XF4F failed, Grumman realized that they didn't have an automatic lock on Navy fighter production. Instead of playing it safe, Grumman decided to put everything they'd learned about producing fighters into the design of the XF6F Hellcat.

While the US wasn't already in the shooting war at the time they started this new design, Grumman and every other US aircraft manufacturer was carefully studying all the lessons of aerial combat coming out of France, England, Poland and the rest of the world already at war. So they knew that it had to be rugged, armored, with self-sealing fuel tanks and heavy armament. They knew it had to have long range - defending carriers was best done as far away from the ships as possible. And it had to be easy to fly - both Grumman and the Navy knew that if the US was drawn into a shooting war, the Navy would be training a lot of new pilots and pushing them into combat long before they'd had the kind of in-depth training they would have received in the pre-war Navy.

There is a widespread and hard-to-kill rumor - even alluded to in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F6F_Hellcat) - that the Hellcat was designed specifically to combat the Japanese Zero. Reality is somewhat different. The Hellcat was ordered in the summer of 1941, six months before Pearl Harbor - and it first flew on June 26, 1942 - roughly the same day that America first discovered an abandoned Japanese Zero shot down near Dutch Harbor in a sideshow to the Battle of Midway. The plane's design had been largely locked down before that damaged Zero had been repaired and put through flight tests. By the time we knew just how maneuverable and lightly-built the Zero really was, the Hellcat was already in production.

Initially, the Hellcat was designed around the R-2600 radial engine, a reliable and rugged 1,700 horsepower engine that powered Grumman's Avenger torpedo bomber, as well as the B-25 Mitchell and A-20 Havoc. However, the 2,000 horsepower Pratt & Whitney R-2800 offered nearly 25 percent more power - and while it was new and relatively unproven, it was already powering the B-26 Marauder, the P-47 Thunderbolt and the soon-to-be-combat-ready F4U Corsair. The R-2600-powered Hellcat was test-flown in June, 1942, and the R-2800 version flew just a month later.

Because the Corsair had some initial problems with Carrier Qualifications - due largely to a too-bouncy landing gear, along with a long nose that obscured the carrier deck just before touchdown - the Hellcat was "to the manor born" - designed from the outset to be a carrier plane. So, early in 1943, the Navy gave the Corsair to Marine and land-based Navy squadrons, while the Hellcat went to the carriers. While the Corsair was far more of a handful to fly, both planes were outstanding combat aircraft, and shared similar characteristics - rugged, long-ranged, heavily-armed - and were superb as both air-combat fighters and as ground-attack aircraft.

However, the Hellcat was far slower - in part because of the very characteristics that made it a good plane to fly from carriers - and it far more quickly faded from view after the war. This is often attributed to the Corsair's superiority in several areas, but it also reflects the fact that while Chance Vought had no suitable follow-on propeller fighter - instead, they kept upgrading the Corsair -Grumman chose to focus on next-generation fighters. Grumman built the F8F Bearcat - literally the smallest plane that could be built around the powerful R2800 - as the fleet-protection hot-rod, while Grumman built the F7F Tigercat as a long-range, twin-engined air defense, ground attack and night/all-weather fighter. In any case, jets - including Grumman's own F9F Panther - quickly pushed both next-generation prop fighters onto the sidelines, while specialized ground-attack versions of the Corsair were produced right through the Korean War, 1950-53.

But in it's day, and in its war, the Hellcat was the best carrier-based plane on earth. Once the Corsair was finally carrier-qualified, it carried a full load, but it was never as forgiving for new pilots, never quite as rugged or quite as maneuverable as the Hellcat.

During the war, more than 12,000 Hellcats were produced - not bad for a fighter that didn't first fly until six months after the war started - and in that war it destroyed more than 19 Japanese planes for every Hellcat lost in air-to-air combat. It had a well-earned reputation for bringing its pilots home, and, as one Hellcat pilot put it, "if it could cook, I'd marry it."

Eduard has produced a couple of kits of the Hellcat - essentially the same in all the important particulars - one is a two-for-one (two models in one box) kit of the Royal Navy/Fleet Air Arm's Hellcat Mk. I and Mk. II - essentially the US Navy's F6F-3 and F6F-5, which had few visible changes besides a rear window. The plane was constantly upgraded during the war, but the upgrades were minor - the plane was "right," right from the start. This makes it easier for a kit manufacturer to produce a single kit that covers both major versions.

I have to admit to being an Eduard Junkie - they produce more fascinating aircraft, with more remarkable add-ons - PE, Resin, Masks, optional parts, the whole nine yards. In this kit - in both Eduard Hellcat kits - they have not disappointed. For those who like FAA aircraft, the Hellcat Mk. I and Mk. II is a significant step in the process between outmoded two-seat fighter-reconaissance fighters like the Fulmar and converted short-range land-based fighters like the Sea Gladiator, Sea Hurricane and Seafire and modern made-for-carrier single-seat fighters. While the FAA had fewer than 900 Hellcats, they fought in Norway (in a strike against the Tirpitz - one of the few times the Hellcat took on German front-line fighters), across Southeast Asia and in the approaches to Japan.

This kit offers markings for six FAA aircraft - Mk. I Hellcats from 800 Squadron flown by Lt. Blythe Ritchie when he shot down a Focke Wulf Fw 190 on May 8, 1944; another aircraft from 800 Squadron during D-Day and on through the invasion of Southern France in August, 1944; and one from 1844 Squadron fighting in the Southeast Asia/Pacific Theater. Mk. II aircraft include an 808 Squadron in the Pacific theater; an 1839 Squadron Hellcat in the invasion of Okinawa that was flown by ace Sub-Lieutenant WMC Foster and another 1839 Squadron Hellcat which saw combat over Formosa and Okinawa. Considering the limited number of aircraft in service, Eduard provided a wide variety of camouflage and markings - they would have been hard-pressed to find a better or more diverse selection of aircraft.


The Kit

F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit
F6F Kit

I've received the essentially identical FAA kit. Cybermodel reports: "Eduard has done an excellent job with this one!"

One of the areas that all modelers have looked at for accuracy on any new Hellcat involves the shape of the plane's rear fuselage. Eduard caught this shape right, something no other kit maker has done - not Otaki or Hasegawa or Trumpeter or any of the others who've tackled this seemingly straightforward but oddly illusive aircraft.

The Hellcat cowling is another detail that had always eluded Hellcat kit manufacturers and aftermarket accessory makers - up till now. Compound curves are hard to capture, which makes a spot-on model hard to capture, but the Hellcat's chin scoop and engine opening have never been caught quite right. However, Eduard has caught this detail in the kit. In short, this kit has it all.

Markings

Markings are provided for five aircraft:

  • F6F-3, BuNo 66016 (probabe), #32, VF-16, USS Lexington, 1943
  • F6F-3, BuNo 25813, #13 (33-F-13), VF-33, Ondonga, 1943, as flown by Lt. C.K. Hilderbrandt
  • F6F-3, BuNo 40090, #9, VF-1, USS Yorktown, 1944, as flown by Lt William Moseley
  • F6F-3, BuBo 40467, #19, VF-6, USS Intrepid, 1944, as flown by Lt Alexander Vraciu
  • F6F-3, BuNo unk, #17, VF-27, USS Princeton, 1944, as flown by Lt Richard Stambook

What Would Joe Foss Do?



What would Joe Foss do?
Commentary by Ned Barnett


Joe Foss was a poor kid from South Dakota, growing up in the Depression, when his dad died.

He had a dream, though - he'd met Charles Lindbergh in 1928 and seen a Marine Fighter Squadron barnstorming through his neck of the prairie in 1930 - and that dream required college - a tough act for a poor orphaned kid, but he managed to do it, earning both a bachelor of business administration and a private pilot's license.

His dream was to be a Marine aviator - but in those pre-war days, the odds against even qualified applicants were two in 100 - he hitchhiked 300 miles to Minneapolis, took the test with 100 young men, and was one of the two.

After completing training and a 9-month tour as an instructor (something only the best trainee pilots were assigned - and few liked) he was assigned to an observation squadron (aka "target") in San Diego instead of a fighter squadron - but he noticed that a lot of trainee aviators were "buying the farm" - he went to the base commander (a Navy Commander who hated Marines) and offered to trade duty as "funeral officer" for stick-time in a fighter. In three months, he racked up more than 150 hours in a Wildcat - that was more than 3 hours per day for 47 consecutive days (all while fulfilling his assigned duties as an observation-unit pilot AND funeral officer).

As the only carrier-qualified Marine aviator in San Diego, he was named Exec of a squadron about to sail into combat, even thought many thought of him as "the old man" - too old for fighter combat (he was 27 - average age of new fighter pilots, 23).

His first combat mission over Guadalcanal he had his engine shot out and made a "hot" dead-stick landing - but only after he'd shot down the first of many deadly Japanese Zeroes to fall under his guns.

The fourth time he was shot down, he realized that "one more and I'll be a Japanese Ace" - but by that time he'd shot down something like 19 confirmed first-line Japanese planes (mostly Zeros, piloted by the cream of the best in the Imperial Japanese Air Force - the Tainan Wing).

One time, after downing three or four Japanese fighters, combat damage to his engine forced him to ditch his Wildcat two miles of the beach of Malaita Island (about 50 or so miles from Guadalcanal). The plane sank fast, his foot caught in his seat, and before he knew it, he was 30 feet under and "breathing" seawater. Convinced he was going to die, instead of panicking, he calmed himself, figured out how to free himself and used his Mae West life preserver to get him back to the surface (breathing more seawater along the way). To tired to swim, he decided to float on his back until his strength came back - until he saw a couple of shark-fins. Then he saw a couple of canoes - convinced they were Japs looking for him, he decided to "face down" the sharks - until he heard an Australian voice and surfaced again. The next day, Major Mad Jack Cramm - the personal pilot to the Marine Air Commander (General Geiger) - taxied his PBY Catalina right up onto the beach to retrieve Foss - and two days later, he was back in combat, shooting down a couple more Japanese fighters in the process.

He finished his tour of duty with 26 confirmed kills - tying Eddie Rickenbacker (WW-I American Ace of Aces) - but unlike some self-centered Aces, Foss led a unit that fought with him - together with Foss, his flight (Foss's Flying Circus) shot down 72 confirmed enemies - literally all of those young-buck grass-green fighter pilots he'd brought into combat (except the two who didn't survive) became aces in their own right under Foss's masterful training and leadership. Aces like von Richthofen often couldn't remember the names of their wingmen - Foss made medal-bedecked aces of them.

His technique was simple - he flew so close to the enemy that he couldn't miss (of course, they couldn't, either, which is why he was nearly a Japanese ace, too) - his flight-members used to joke that he'd leave "powder burns" on his targets by holding fire until he was in slow-pitch softball range of his enemy. The results - 26 confirmed kills leading a team of eight "novice" pilots that together scored 72 confirmed kills - speak for themselves.

Amazingly, Foss did all this while flying a plane considered obsolete even before the war began (the F4F Wildcat was slower in level flight, slower in the climb and much less maneuverable than the Zero - it also had much less range). He was the highest-scoring ace in Marine history, and won the Congressional Medal of Honor - the highest award available to American servicemen (most who earn it do so posthumously).

After the war, a bureaucratic bungle denied him a "Regular" commission in the Marines - so he founded the South Dakota Air National Guard. He served in the regular Air Force in Korea, and retired a Brigadier General.

Retiring from the Guard, he became the Governor of South Dakota, the Commissioner of the American Football League, the host of two TV programs (running, together, for about 10 years) and - late in life (as in, during his 70s) he became President of the National Rifle Association.

At age 87, airport "security" in Phoenix (this was after 9/11) tried to stop him from boarding a plane for a flight to New York (where he was scheduled to address the Cadets at West Point) for carrying a "dangerous weapon" - the five-pointed star of his Congressional Medal of Honor.

What would Joe Foss do? Apparently, he laughed it off (I understand he actually let the idiot security guard live).

Now, when I'm in a tough spot, I ask myself, "what would Joe Foss do?" (hint - move in close before opening fire - never give up - never slow down - and never take "no" for an answer).

Big Ed - Eduard's Do-it-All Sets ...

Eduard - those remarkable Czechs who have all but revolutionized the customization and super-detailing of plastic model kits - have come up with a remarkable way to package up their goodies in one box. They call these packages "Big Ed" - and when you think about what they offer, they really are just about everything you need to super-detail your favorite model kits. As always with Eduard, the quality is second to none, the results all but unbelievable.

Big Ed - 1/72 B-17 F/G Flying Fortress/Academy Kit: This includes PE landing flaps, exterior detail, bomb bay, and self-adhesive pre-painted interior photo-etched parts to dress up your Academy kit.

Big Ed - 1/48 A6M5c Zero/Hasegawa Kit: What you need to detail the landing flaps, the interior and the kit in general. The Hasegawa kit is all but complete - but this Big Ed set took it to the next level.

Big Ed - 1/32 P-47D-20 Thunderbolt/Trumpeter Kit: This is one of the BIG Big Ed sets: it includes gun bays, exterior PE, engine details, wheel well details, self-adhesive cockpit placards and self-adhesive cockpit details ... for the ultimate Trumpeter Thunderbolt, this Big Ed can't be beat.

Big Ed - 1/38 Fw 190A-8/Hasegawa Kit: Eduard has done a number of Focke Wulf "Big Ed" sets - for their own remarkable series of Fw 190s as well as for those kits produced by competitors. This provides details, landing flaps and self-adhesive cockpit details for the Hasegawa kit. However, whichever Focke Wulf you're building, Eduard seems to have a Big Ed set for you.

This blog post will grow over time ... stay tuned, or contact me for critiques on specific Big Ed sets.

Late-war SPAD XIII - French Powerhouse by Eduard in 1/48



The SPAD XIII was one of the most remarkably effective fighter aircraft of the First World War - superior to the Nieuport that it replaced, and at least as effective as the Camel and SE5 fielded by the Royal Flying Corps. While conventional wisdom asserts that the Fokker D-VII was the pre-eminent operational fighter of that war - and in this case, "conventional wisdom" might just be right - the SPAD XIII was able to hold its own in aerial combat, right up to the end of the war. The SPAD XIII - an upgraded and upgunned version of the SPAD VII - served in combat with the air forces of France, Great Britain, the USA, Italy, Belgium - and, after the war, with the newly-born states of Poland and Czechoslovakia.

Eduard has been creating some remarkable World War I fighter aircraft - word on the street is that they've done all in this area that they intend to do - but before they end the series, they've just released the late-version of the SPAD XIII in 1/48th Scale. In addition to several beautifully-molded sprues of light brown plastic, the kit comes complete with some exquisite decals (for several versions), as well as PE and masks for the limited clear part(s). The PE includes gunsights, perforated engine screens, pre-colored instruments - as well as seat belts that add much to the overall appeal of the cockpit.

I've built and reviewed maybe a couple-dozen Eduard kits over the years - I still can't get over the remarkable quality and attention to detail that Eduard provides. And like all of the best professionals, they make it look easy. If you like lots of wings and lots of wires, you'll like the Eduard SPAD XIII.

Operators

Spads, 1930s magazine illustration with the French Great War fighter plane flown by all of the Allied airforces
Spads, 1930s magazine illustration with the French Great War fighter plane flown by all of the Allied airforces
Flag of Argentina Argentina
(Two aircraft)
Flag of Belgium Belgium
Flag of Brazil Brazil
Flag of Czechoslovakia Czechoslovakia
(Post-war)
Flag of France France
Flag of Greece Greece
Flag of Italy Italy
Flag of Japan Japan
Flag of Poland Poland
(Post-war)
Flag of Russia Russian Empire
Flag of Thailand Siam (Thailand)
Flag of Spain Kingdom of Spain
Flag of Turkey Turkey
Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom
Flag of the United States United States
Flag of Uruguay Uruguay

Specifications (SPAD S.XIII)

Data from Sharpe, 2000. p 272.

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 6.25 m (20 ft 6 in)
  • Wingspan: 8.25 m (27 ft 1 in)
  • Height: 2.60 m (8 ft 6.5 in)
  • Wing area: 21.1 m² (227 ft²)
  • Empty weight: 566 kg (1,245 lb)
  • Loaded weight: 856 kg (1,888 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 845 kg (1,863 lb)
  • Powerplant:Hispano-Suiza 8Be 8 cylinder vee-type, 220 hp (164 kw)

Performance

Armament

Lysander - A Plane Out of Time


A Review of the Lysander III - a remarkable new kit by Eduard.




Lysander was a gifted Spartan general who defeated Athens in the 4th Century BC - how that relates to the ungainly aircraft produced by Westland Aircraft Company for the Royal Air Force, beginning in the mid-1930s is something of a mystery. Certainly, even at it's best, the "Lizzie" was never intended for aggressive combat operations.

It is more-or-less axiomatic that generals prepare to fight the last war, rather than the next war, and in the Depression-era 1930s, far too many generals prepared to re-fight the deadlocked trench warfare of 1914-1918 - in fact, one reason that the Germans did so well early in World War II is that their generals, having lost the last war, looked for alternatives to trench warfare, and more-or-less discovered Blitzkreig. Oddly, however, it was a few gifted innovators in the Royal Army who "discovered" the signature element of the Blitzkreig - combined-arms tank warfare - in exercises on Salisbury Plain in the late 1920s. But while the British generals ignored the lessons, a young German officer, Heinz Guderian, paid close attention, and put it to work a decade later to lead Hitler's legions to victory in Western Europe.

In the 30s, though, most generals planned to re-fight the last war, and developed the technology needed to win that fight. Infantry-cooperation tanks such as the British Matilda and the French Char Bis had near-impregnable armor along with weapons more adapted to fighting entrenched soldiers than highly-mobile tanks - whereas the Germans created lighter, faster, more mobile tanks well-suited to fighting other tanks. This perspective also translated into aircraft design.

When it came to aircraft, many countries produced Lysander-like aircraft - big, relatively powerful aircraft designed to "cooperate" with ground forces. They were powerful - for instance, the Lysander used an 850 hp Bristol Mercury engine - and they were big. The Lysander, for instance, had a wingspan of 50 feet and it's take-off weight was more than three tons.

In the US, the equivalent was the even-larger North American Aviation O-47 (3.5 tons, 975 horsepower); and in Germany, the Henschel HS-126, which was nearly identical to the Lysander in size, overall layout, power and performance. What these had in common was the belief that "army cooperation" involved conducting armred reconaissance over the enemy's trenches, usually with heavy fighter aircraft coverage. These planes were not intended to fly without escort.

However, the second world war taught a different lesson - instead of big, heavy "targets" designed to track activities over enemy trenches and fixed fortifications, front-line reconaissance in mobile combat needed to be conducted by light spotter aircraft that could land in the field - or carry the commander over the terrain ahead. In fact, many front-line commanders became pilots - both Rommel and Eisenhower were able to fly light aircraft, and frequently did.

The German flew the Fiesler Fi-156 Storch, an ungainly and awkward-looking two-man aircraft specially designed with a variety of sophisticated high-lifte devices that enabled it to land and take off in incredibly-short distances over unprepared "runways" - often dirt roads or fairly level pastureland.

The US and the RAF took a different approach - they took light civilian two-man aircraft "off the shelf" and turned them into front-line observation and liaison aircraft. The US Air Corps "drafted" the Piper Cub, the Taylorcraft and their light-plane stablemates, while the RAF used the largely similar Auster. After the Battle of France in May and June, 1940, no major military force used heavy, powerful "Army Cooperation" aircraft - at least not for the combat missions these planes had been built to fulfill.

The Lysander - a sophisticated, powerful and expensive aircraft - had been designed to help win the last war, and was incapble of fulfilling its over-the-front-lines mission in the Second World War. In the US, this meant that the O-47 was built in very few numbers and quickly retired from anything but safe, Stateside second-line duties.

But the RAF still had a lot of Lysanders - and dared not shut down their production lines as long as the aircraft could be profitably used for some mission. With France occupied and British forces driven from the continent, a sudden need arose to clandestinely transport "Special Operations" forces into France and to bring out shot-down pilots, "blown" secret agents and others more valuable alive and in England than dead or in the Germans' hands. Several thousand Lysanders were built and used throughout the war, and in almost every combat zone.

Lysanders were also sold or given to several other countries, including the US Army Air Force - where it was used as a target tug - Portugal, India, Estonia ... and Finland. The Lysander in Finnish service is the subject of Eduard's latest "Limited Edition" kit, the "Lysander Mk. III in Ilmavoimat Service." Finland's two wars with the Soviet Union - the "Winter War" and the "Continuation War" (which ended when the Finns signed a separate peace with the USSR and declared war on its former ally, Nazi Germany). Because Finland did not have indigenous light Piper Cub-like aircraft, and because the war with the Soviets tended to be rather static - battling between Leningrad and Helsinki in the Karelian Peninsula - the Lysander still had a role to play, and in combat, it did it's job reliably (if unspectacularly) - observing enemy formations, dropping light bombs to disrupt those formations, and - as a utility aircraft - do whatever else was needed.

This Limited Edition kit has it all - two sprues of exquisitely-molded gray-plastic parts, a separate sprue of crystal-clear parts, a PE fret, resin parts - even masks that help when it comes to painting the metal framework on the clear canopy.

I've built many of the Lysander kits that have been on the market, and - no surprise, this is the best of the lot, by far. Eduard knows that some modelers like to build models - instead of a engine-like blob, for instance, they give you a crankcase and nine individual cylanders, as well as a wiring harness and an exhaust system that gets the job done. The visibile internal structure is just that - visible. The machine guns look like guns, not gun-like lumps of plastic. The propeller features individual blades, which must be properly afixed to the hub. They even include 15 parts that were intended for other versions of the Lysander released by Gavia or Eduard - these parts will be welcome additions to any modeler's spare-parts box.

As with many "limited production" kits coming out of Eastern Europe, there are no locating holes and pins - builders need to take the extra step of dry-fitting parts and making minor adjustments to ensure proper fit ... and of course, some of the parts have a bit of flash ... but nothing any modeler worth his putty can't handle.

I am going through my "Finnish" phase, building everything I can find that flew in the Winter War and the Continuation War. I have done this several times before, in part because the Finns had a rare gift for taking hand-me-down aircraft nobody else wanted (or thought of as front-line combat aircraft) and turned them into battle-winners.

For instance, the Brewster Buffalo - decimated by the Japanese in Malaya, the Dutch East Indies and over Midway Island - proved incredibly effective against far more modern Soviet aircraft - including those made in the West and easily a generation later in concept and design than the Buffalo. The Blenheim - which in RAF service was one of the most efficient ways of turning highly-skilled British bomber crews into German POWs - was, in the hands of Finnish pilots, remarkably successful in its intended role. Other aircraft long-since obslolete in the hands of more well-equipped air forces fought well and effectively in the hands of the Finns - the Curtiss H-75 (in US service, the P-36 - the father of the P-40) and the Morane MS-406 joined the Buffalo and successful air-to-air combat over higher-performance Soviet aircraft.

Oddly, the Soviets were also strangly gifted in turning "also-ran" aircraft into war winners. Some of the Soviet's must successful combat aces scored against the best Luftwaffe had to offer while flying the P-39 Airacobra, a late-30s "transition-era" aircraft that was a mediocre place-holder when used by the US Army Air Force - holding the line in the Southwest Pacific and in North Africa until really "modern" aircraft - P-38 Lightnings, P-47 Thunderbolts or P-51 Mustangs - could be brought into service and meet the Germans and Japanese on more equal terms. While these US pilots were eager to fly almost anything else except the Airacobra, many of the Soviet Union's best pilots demanded more "Kobras," knowing that in the right hands (theirs), it could easily "best" even the latest German Bf 109s and Fw 190s, right up to the fall of Berlin in 1945.

Go figure.

The Finns were the same - they flew mid-30s-era P-36s, Moranes and Buffalos right up till the end of the war, and never lost their edge over skilled and well-equipped Soviet pilots.

And while the Lysander wasn't a front-line fighter aircraft, it was - in the hands of the Finns - an effective combat aircraft right up to 1945. And like the Buffalo and the Morane, it was so ugly that it is in some ways attractive. If you want something odd and ungainly in your collection, this Eduard kit is one you ought to consider.


History: The Lysander was the first British airplane stationed in France during World War Two but was soon found to be vulnerable because of its relatively slow speed. Withdrawn from frontline service, this two-seat, high-winged monoplane would soon become famous for its nocturnal flights into occupied Europe, dropping supplies and agents behind enemy lines.

The Lysander was built by Westland as an army co-operation aircraft at the request of the RAF. The first prototype was flown on June 15, 1936, and a contract for 144 more was signed. The Lysander began its service with No. 16 squadron of the RAF in June of 1938. The Lysander also saw service with France, Turkey and Ireland. Apart from dropping spies and equipment into occupied France, the Lysander also served as a target tug, and performed invaluable service during air-sea rescue operations over the English Channel.

The Lysander was also built under license in Canada, where 225 were constructed by the end of the war. There are approximately 20 surviving Lysanders today, all but one having served with the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF).
[History by David MacGillivray]

Nicknames: Lizzie; Flying Carrot

Specifications (Lysander III):
Engine: One 870-hp Bristol Mercury XX nine-cylinder radial engine
Weight: Empty 4,365 lbs., Max Takeoff 6,318 lbs.
Wing Span: 50ft. 0in.
Length: 30ft. 6in.
Height: 14ft. 6in.
Performance:
Maximum Speed: 212 mph
Ceiling: 21,500 ft.
Range: 600 miles
Armament: None